两种海浪模式对中国黄海海域浪高模拟能力的比较

作者：梅婵娟1  赵栋梁1  史剑2

单位：1. 中国海洋大学海洋环境学院 山东 青岛 266100; 2. 解放军理工大学气象学院 江苏 南京 211101

关键词：WAVEWATCH模式 SWAN模式 QuikSCAT/NCEP混合风场 有效波高

分类号：P731

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2008·25·第二期（92-98）

摘要：

本文利用第三代海浪数值模式WAVEWATCH和SWAN模式,分别对黄海区域进行了理想模拟计算和实际浪场的模拟计算,结果表明:理想状态下两种模式的模拟结果在大小和空间分布上都不相同,但在大小及其变化趋势上相差不大;在实际模拟中,将两种模式的模拟结果与实际观测值相比,发现SWAN模式模拟结果较WAVEWATCH模式好,只是在高风速的模拟情况下,SWAN模式模拟结果偏大,而WAVEWATCH模式模拟结果偏小。

In this paper,the third wave models WAVEWATCH and SWAN are both used to simulate the sea wave in Yellow Sea,meanwhile,the modeled sea wave are compared with the measured sea wave.The comparisons of simulated sea wave calculated by two different wave models show that there are different in special and temporal distribution for the simulated sea wave,but the value and changing trend of sea wave are similar;comparisons of the simulated and measured sea wave present that simulated result of SWAN is better than the result of WAVEWATCH,however,the simulated result of SWAN is larger and the simulated result of WAVEWATCH is smaller than the measured data in the high wind speed condition.

参考文献：

[1] 徐艳清,等.东中国海海浪数值模式的研究[J].海洋科学,2005,29(6):42～47. [2] 李明悝,侯一筠.利用QuikSCAT/NCEP混合风场及WAVEWATCH模拟东中国海风浪场[J].海洋科学,2005,29(6):9～12. [3] 齐义泉,等.WWATCH模式模拟南海海浪场的结果分析[J].海洋学报,2003,25(4):1～9. [4] 李燕,薄兆海.SWAN模式对黄渤海海域浪高的模拟能力试验[J].海洋预报,2005,22(3):75～82. [5] 波浪数值预报.海浪及其预报[M].北京:气象出版社.1991,147～189. [6] 闻斌,刘俊.海浪数值模式研究回顾与进展[J].海洋预报,2006,23(4):76～81. [7] 李燕,薄兆海.SWAN模式对黄渤海海域浪高的模拟能力试验[J].海洋预报,2005,22(3):75～82. [8] Holthuijsen L H,Booij N,et al.SWAN User Manual (Cycle Ⅲ verion 40.41)[M],Delft:Delft University of Technology,2000. [9] Hendrik L.Tolman.User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH-Ⅲ version 2.22,Technology Note 214,2002.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】